|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]肖颖超.坚定白话文道路 开创当代文学新局面——对毕耕先生“文言复兴论”的批判[J].温州职业技术学院学报,2007,01:38-40.
 XIAO Ying-chao.Insisting on Writing in Vernacular Chinese, Creating the New Prospect of Contemporary Literature ——A Criticism on Mr. Bi Geng's "Revival of Writing in Classical Style"[J].Journal of Wenzhou Vocational and Technical College,2007,01:38-40.
点击复制

坚定白话文道路 开创当代文学新局面——对毕耕先生“文言复兴论”的批判(PDF)

《温州职业技术学院学报》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:
2007年01期
页码:
38-40
栏目:
语言学研究
出版日期:
2007-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Insisting on Writing in Vernacular Chinese, Creating the New Prospect of Contemporary Literature ——A Criticism on Mr. Bi Geng's "Revival of Writing in Classical Style"
作者:
肖颖超
湖北大学人民武装学院, 湖北武汉430223
Author(s):
XIAO Ying-chao
People's Armed Forces College, Hubei University, Wuhain, 430223, China
关键词:
白话文言文言复兴文学创作
Keywords:
Writing in vernacular Chinese Writing in classical style Revival of writing in classical style Literature creating
分类号:
I045
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
文言文在中国文学史上沿袭了两千多年,虽然在“五四运动”中惨遭淘汰,但直至近年来仍有毕 耕先生等提倡“文言复兴”。其实,白话取代文言是历史发展的必然,是由诸多因素共同推动的结果。我们应当在 坚定白话文道路的同时,还要吸取古典文学的精髓,创作出更多、更新的作品,从而开创中国当代文学的新局面。
Abstract:
Writing in classical style has lasted for more than two thousand years in Chinese literary history. Although it was eliminated in the "May 4th Movement", Mr. Bigeng and others have advocated "revival of writing in classical style" in recent years. In fact, the replacement of writing in classical style with writing in vernacular Chinese is the developing trend of history, and has many causes. We should insist on writing in vernacular Chinese but, at the same time, draw on the essence of classical literature, writing more and more initiative works to create the new prospect of contemporary Chinese literature.

参考文献/References

[1] 毕耕. 文言,魂兮归来[J]. 社会科学论坛,2003,(6).
[2] 鲁迅. 中国小说史略[M]. 天津:百花文艺出版社,2002:75.
[3] 刘知几. 史通·言语[M] / / 郭绍虞. 中国历代文论选:第2册. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2001:29 .
[4] 黄遵宪. 日本国志·学术志[M] / / 郭绍虞. 中国历代文论选: 第4 册. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2001:117.
[5] 胡适. 胡适文集:第1卷[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1998:312.
[6] 梁启超. 小说与群治之关系[M] / / 郭绍虞. 中国历代文论选:第4 册. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2001:207 .
[7] 毕耕. 文言复兴论[J]. 理论月刊,2003,(11).
[8] 刘再复. 论八十年代文学批评的文体革命[J]. 文学评论,1989,(1).
[9] 黄遵宪. 入境庐诗草自序[M] / / 郭绍虞. 中国历代文论选:第4 册. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2001:127.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期]2006-09-16
[作者简介]肖颖超(1973 —),男,湖北汉川人,湖北大学人民武装学院讲师.
更新日期/Last Update: 2007-03-20