|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]蹇佳伶.使用原作文学角色侵犯改编权的理论基础和判断标准[J].温州职业技术学院学报,2020,01:71-75.
 JIAN Jialing.The Theoretical Basis and Judging Criteria of Violation of Adaptation Right by Using Original Literary Roles[J].Journal of Wenzhou Vocational and Technical College,2020,01:71-75.
点击复制

使用原作文学角色侵犯改编权的理论基础和判断标准(PDF)

《温州职业技术学院学报》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:
2020年01期
页码:
71-75
栏目:
政治·法律
出版日期:
2020-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Theoretical Basis and Judging Criteria of Violation of Adaptation Right by Using Original Literary Roles
文章编号:
1671-4326 (2020) 01-0071-05
作者:
蹇佳伶
(华东政法大学 知识产权学院,上海 200042)
Author(s):
JIAN Jialing
(Intellectual Property Institute, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, 200042, China)
关键词:
文学角色改编权思想-表达二分法整体感观法
Keywords:
Literary role Adaptation right Thought-expression dichotomy Overall perception method
分类号:
D923.
DOI:
10.13669/j.cnki.33-1276/z.2020.014
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
根据文字作品中的角色改编是否侵犯改编权在司法实践中观点不一,不仅在改编类型上体现出侵权 判断的不同,即使都改编为视听作品,文学角色及其相关元素或被认为必须要与特定故事情节结合才能保护,或被 认为具有独创性可以单独保护。目前司法实践中多采用抽象测试法判断文学角色及其相关元素是否为思想,但该方 法存在局限性和适用困难。为防止对“思想-表达二分法”的僵化适用抑制公众对人物角色设计的创新,实践中除 抽象测试法之外,应重视结合适用整体感观法判断改编权侵权问题,即在判断文学角色是否能作为改编权的客体时, 应当融入普通理性人对原作基本独创性表达的判断,看文学角色及其相关元素是否被充分开发后形成独特的性格内 涵,以及是否与原作形成渊源关系。
Abstract:
In the judicial practice, arguments vary in whether the adaptation of the roles from original literary works violates the adaptation right. Infringement judgements differ not only in the type of adaptation, but even being adapted as audiovisual works, literary roles and their related elements may be considered to be protected in combination with a specific storyline, or can be protected individually if they are considered to be original. At present, the abstract test method is usually used to judge whether the literary role and its related elements are thoughts in the judicial practice. However, this method has limitations and difficulties in application. In order to prevent the rigid application of the "thought-expression dichotomy" from inhibiting public innovation in the design of character roles, it is required to pay attention to the application of overall perception method to determine the infringement of adaptation right in practice except the abstract test method. In other words, when judging whether the literary role can be used as the object of adaptation right, the judgment of ordinary rational people on the basic original expression of the original work should be incorporated to see whether the literary role and its related elements have been fully developed to form a unique character connotation, and whether it has a relationship with the original work.

参考文献/References

[1] 陈锦川.著作权审判原理解读与实务指导[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:316.
[2] 冯晓青.著作权法中思想与表达“二分法”的法律与经济学分析[J].云南大学学报(法学版),2004(1):30.
[3] 熊文聪.被误读的“思想/表达二分法”——以法律修辞学为视角的考察[J].现代法学,2012(6):169-180.
[4] 许春明.网络游戏的知识产权侵权分析[N].上海法制报,2014-05-07(6).
[5] 李雨峰.思想/表达二分法的检讨[J].北大法律评论,2007(2):450.
[6] 李思羽.改编文学角色为网络游戏角色的侵权行为认定[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6).
[7] Libott R Y.Round the Prickly Pear:“The Idea-Expression Fallacy in a Mass Communications World”[J].14 UCLA L.Rev,1967(3):735.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期] 2020-02-11 [作者简介]蹇佳伶(1996—),女,四川广元人,硕士,主要从事知识产权法研究.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-05